By Izuchukwu Adichie
As November 8 approaches, the political space in Anambra remains unsurprisingly quiet. It is because the politicians who will be contesting against Soludo are headed toward an inevitable defeat -and they are aware. Their efforts are in futile, as none is capable of securing victory against Soludo and his party, the All Progressives Grand Alliance (APGA), at their ward level, where grassroots support is crucial.
What is particularly striking in this off-cycle election is the extent to which these politicians are going to fund their campaigns. Many are already borrowing large sums from banks, using their personal properties as collateral. However, the need for funds is not solely for campaigning; it is primarily to maintain their every election cycle status as “gubernatorial candidate”.
Instead of seeking collaborative opportunities with Soludo’s government through public-private-community partnerships (PPCP) that could promote sustainable development across Anambra communities, these politicians are trapped in a cycle of desperation and self-deceit. The funds that these kindergarten politicians will share will only provide a boost to the local economy, benefiting those who view the election as a special season.
As the election date draws nearer, it becomes increasingly clear that the real winner may not only be Soludo who will be re-elected, but Ndi Anambra. The loans when circulated can indeed stimulate the local economy. However, this situation raises an important question: Why take a loan to fund an election you will still lose?